TL;DR
- Volatility skew shows how implied volatility differs across strike prices, and smart covered call traders use this pattern to select strikes that collect higher premium for the same risk.
- Out-of-the-money calls often trade at lower implied volatility than at-the-money options, creating a “smirk” that rewards strike selection discipline.
- Understanding skew helps you avoid the trap of chasing premium without seeing what the market is actually pricing in.
- The best covered call strikes balance income capture against assignment risk, and skew data reveals where that balance actually lives.
Back in 2007, I was trading my own account and doing reasonably well. Then 2008 hit, and I learned something the hard way: the market doesn’t care what you think you know. I watched positions evaporate because I hadn’t built a real system. I had pieces of one, fragments I’d picked up from Edward Thorp’s Beat the Market and William O’Neill’s CANSLIM methodology, but I hadn’t fused them into something I could trust when things got ugly.
That crisis forced a decision. I could keep being an emotional trader like everyone else, or I could build and stick to a system. I chose the latter. I amalgamated everything I’d learned into one repeatable framework: stack probabilities in your favor. Right stocks, right market timing, right entry points, then layer covered calls for income. Cash Flow Machine was born from that decision, and that same probability-stacking mindset applies directly to what we’re talking about today: how volatility skew should guide your strike selection.
What Volatility Skew Actually Shows You
Most covered call traders pick strikes by feel. They look at the premium and think, “That looks good,” or they pick a strike price that feels “far enough away” from the current stock price. This is like driving with your eyes on the speedometer instead of the road.
Volatility skew is the pattern of implied volatility across different strike prices for the same expiration. In a typical equity options chain, you’ll see something called a “volatility smirk” or “reverse skew”: out-of-the-money puts trade at higher implied volatility than at-the-money options, and out-of-the-money calls often trade at lower implied volatility. The market is pricing in the probability of downside crashes more aggressively than upside explosions.
Here’s why this matters for covered calls. When you sell an out-of-the-money call, you’re often selling at a volatility discount to the at-the-money option. The market is saying, “We don’t think this stock is likely to explode upward.” That can be good news for you: lower implied volatility on your sold call means lower breakeven points and more cushion. But it also means you need to be precise. The premium you’re collecting reflects a specific probability, and understanding that probability separates the pros from the amateurs.
I learned this through fifty years of watching markets. I’ve seen the 1987 crash, the dot-com bubble, the 2002 bear market, the 2008 Great Recession, and the 2020 COVID crash. Each time, the traders who understood what the options market was actually pricing survived and thrived. Those who just chased premium without seeing the underlying structure got hurt.
How Skew Patterns Reveal Market Psychology
The shape of the volatility skew tells you what the collective market intelligence believes about a stock’s future. A steep skew, where out-of-the-money puts are dramatically more expensive than calls, suggests fear of downside. A flatter skew suggests more balanced uncertainty. An inverted skew, where out-of-the-money calls trade at higher implied volatility than puts, suggests speculative enthusiasm or potential upside catalysts.
For covered call writers, this is actionable intelligence. When you see a steep put skew on a stock you own, the market is handing you information: downside protection is expensive, which means your covered call strategy is working with a stock that has elevated crash risk. This doesn’t mean avoid the stock. It means your strike selection should account for that risk. You might choose a closer strike to collect more premium and build a larger cushion, or you might reduce position size.
Conversely, when you see a flatter skew or even call skew on a growth stock, the market is pricing in upside potential. This is where I found myself with Tesla between 2020 and 2023. The skew patterns shifted as sentiment evolved, and adjusting strike selection to match those shifts was part of how we captured that 500% run while still collecting covered call income. Even covered calls don’t protect you on the way down, but understanding skew helped us stay in positions longer and collect more premium along the way.
After that experience, I made it an absolute rule: no trade enters my book without understanding what the options market is pricing. You can borrow my certainty and my experience and put that as a rule in your trading plan.
Strike Selection Through the Skew Lens
Let me give you a concrete framework. When you’re selecting strikes for covered calls, you have three variables to balance: income (premium collected), upside participation (how much of the stock’s gain you keep if called away), and downside protection (the cushion the premium provides if the stock drops).
Volatility skew affects all three. On a typical stock with reverse skew, selling the at-the-money call gives you the highest implied volatility and thus the highest premium. But it also caps your upside completely and gives you the highest probability of assignment. Selling a 10% out-of-the-money call gives you lower implied volatility, less premium, but more upside participation and lower assignment risk.
The sweet spot lives where skew curvature changes. On many option chains, there’s a point where implied volatility drops off more slowly as you move further out-of-the-money. Finding that inflection point lets you collect disproportionately more premium for the additional assignment risk you’re taking. This is the kind of detail-oriented work that David V., one of my conservative traders, has used to generate roughly 47% returns over a year plus. He always trades in-the-money covered calls, always sticks to his plan, and always pays attention to what the market is actually pricing. Boring makes you rich. Exciting doesn’t make you rich.
Your brain wants to be excited, to chase the big premium numbers or the hot stock. That’s why most people stray from systematic strike selection. The disciplined trader uses skew data to find where the market is mispricing risk, then structures trades to capture that edge.
The Practical Application: Reading Your Chains
Here’s how I actually do this. Before I select any strike, I look at the implied volatility across the entire options chain for my target expiration. I plot it mentally or on paper: strike price on the x-axis, implied volatility on the y-axis. What’s the shape? Where are the kinks or inflections?
Then I ask: what is the market pricing in? If I’m looking at a growth stock and the 30-delta calls trade at 25% implied volatility while the 50-delta calls trade at 35%, that steep drop tells me something. The market is skeptical of big upside moves. If my fundamental analysis disagrees, I might sell a closer strike to capture that higher volatility. If I agree with the market’s skepticism, I might sell further out and take the lower premium for lower assignment risk.
This same analysis applies to how we teach covered calls in our program. Charts are emotions on parade, and implied volatility is one of the most important emotions to read. When you learn to see patterns in skew, you’re employing your brain’s natural pattern-recognition mechanism in a way that most traders never do.
I came by this honestly. I taught my own stockbroker how covered calls worked when I was still in high school and college. He was sixty-something, had been in the business for decades, and had never traded an option until I showed him. Years later, when I had my own brokerage firm, he became my client. The student became the teacher became the student again. That’s what happens when you actually understand a system that most people never bother to learn.
Common Skew Traps and How to Avoid Them
There are two traps I see repeatedly. First, the premium chase. Traders see a high implied volatility number on a far out-of-the-money call and think they’ve found free money. They haven’t. That elevated volatility usually reflects a specific event risk: earnings, FDA decision, merger speculation. The market is pricing something real, and if you don’t know what it is, you’re the sucker at the table.
Second, the complacency trap. When skew flattens after a long bull run, traders assume low volatility will persist. They sell closer strikes, collect less premium than they should, and get caught when volatility explodes and their positions move against them faster than expected. I’ve watched this pattern repeat across every market cycle since 1987. The traders who survive are the ones who respect what skew is telling them even when they don’t like the message.
The solution is systematic. Build your strike selection rules around skew awareness. Know what normal looks like for your core holdings. When skew deviates, understand why before you trade. And always, always have a circuit breaker: a defined point where you exit if the position moves against you by too much. That rule came from hard experience, and it’s non-negotiable in my book.
What is volatility skew in options trading?
Volatility skew is the pattern of implied volatility across different strike prices for the same expiration date. It typically shows as a “smirk” in equity options, with higher implied volatility for downside strikes and lower implied volatility for upside strikes, reflecting the market’s asymmetric view of crash risk versus rally potential.
How does volatility skew affect covered call premium?
Out-of-the-money calls usually trade at lower implied volatility than at-the-money options, meaning you collect less premium per unit of upside risk taken. However, the relationship isn’t linear, and identifying inflection points in the skew curve can reveal strikes where premium remains attractive relative to assignment probability.
Should I avoid stocks with steep volatility skew?
Steep skew indicates elevated downside fear, which isn’t automatically bad for covered call writers. It signals that you should adjust position sizing or strike selection to account for higher crash risk, not that you should avoid the stock entirely. The premium you collect reflects this risk, and systematic traders can profit from properly pricing it.
Understanding volatility skew won’t make you a genius trader overnight. But it will make you a more precise one, and precision compounds over time. If you want to build a covered call system that actually works through market cycles, not just in the easy periods, check out our options mentorship program. We cover this and the other probability-stacking methods that have worked for me across five decades of markets.
This is education, not financial advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor before making investment decisions.